Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 29 Jun 2024 12:53

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Robert M. Jertberg, Frederik J. Wienicke, Krystian Andruszkiewicz, Sander Begeer, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Hilde M. Geurts, Ralph de Vries, Erik Van der Burg (2024). Differences between autistic and non-autistic individuals in audiovisual speech integration: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 164, 105787. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
September 2024
Identifier
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2024.105787
Authors
Robert M. Jertberg, Frederik J. Wienicke, Krystian Andruszkiewicz, Sander Begeer, Bhismadev Chakrabarti, Hilde M. Geurts, Ralph de Vries, Erik Van der Burg
Source
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Details
164, 105787
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Research has indicated unique challenges in audiovisual integration of speech among autistic individuals, although methodological differences have led to divergent findings. We conducted a systematic literature search to identify studies that measured audiovisual speech integration among both autistic and non-autistic individuals. Across the 18 identified studies (combined N = 952), autistic individuals showed impaired audiovisual integration compared to their non-autistic peers (g = 0.69, 95 % CI [0.53, 0.85], p <.001). This difference was not found to be influenced by participants' mean ages, studies' sample sizes, risk-of-bias scores, or paradigms employed. However, a subgroup analysis suggested that child studies may show larger between-group differences than adult ones. The prevailing pattern of impaired audiovisual speech integration in autism may have cascading effects on communicative and social behavior. However, small samples and inconsistency in designs/analyses translated into considerable heterogeneity in findings and opacity regarding the influence of underlying unisensory and attentional factors. We recommend three key directions for future research: larger samples, more research with adults, and standardization of methodology and analytical approaches.

Study authors in this cited reference