Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 28/10/2023 11:58

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Lindsay M. Oberman, Sunday M. Francis, Sarah H. Lisanby (2024). The use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 17(1), 17-26. Wiley.

Date de publication
23/10/2023
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.3041
Auteurs
Lindsay M. Oberman, Sunday M. Francis, Sarah H. Lisanby
Source
Autism Research
Détails
17(1), 17-26
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have recently emerged as alternative, nonpharmacological interventions for a variety of psychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental conditions. NIBS is beginning to be applied in both research and clinical settings for the treatment of core and associated symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) including social communication deficits, restricted and repetitive behaviors, irritability, hyperactivity, depression and impairments in executive functioning and sensorimotor integration. Though there is much promise for these targeted device‐based interventions, in other disorders (including adult major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) where rTMS is FDA cleared), data on the safety and efficacy of these interventions in individuals with ASD is limited especially in younger children when neurodevelopmental interventions typically begin. Most studies are open‐label, small scale, and/or focused on a restricted subgroup of individuals with ASD. There is a need for larger, randomized controlled trials that incorporate neuroimaging in order to develop predictive biomarkers of treatment response and optimize treatment parameters. We contend that until such studies are conducted, we do not have adequate estimates of the safety and efficacy of NIBS interventions in children across the spectrum. Thus, broad off‐label use of these techniques in this population is not supported by currently available evidence. Here we discuss the existing data on the use of NIBS to treat symptoms related to ASD and discuss future directions for the field.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée