Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 28 Oct 2023 11:58

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Lindsay M. Oberman, Sunday M. Francis, Sarah H. Lisanby (2024). The use of noninvasive brain stimulation techniques in autism spectrum disorder. Autism Research, 17(1), 17-26. Wiley.

Publication date
23 Oct 2023
Identifier
10.1002/aur.3041
Authors
Lindsay M. Oberman, Sunday M. Francis, Sarah H. Lisanby
Source
Autism Research
Details
17(1), 17-26
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, including repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), have recently emerged as alternative, nonpharmacological interventions for a variety of psychiatric, neurological, and neurodevelopmental conditions. NIBS is beginning to be applied in both research and clinical settings for the treatment of core and associated symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) including social communication deficits, restricted and repetitive behaviors, irritability, hyperactivity, depression and impairments in executive functioning and sensorimotor integration. Though there is much promise for these targeted device‐based interventions, in other disorders (including adult major depressive disorder (MDD) and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) where rTMS is FDA cleared), data on the safety and efficacy of these interventions in individuals with ASD is limited especially in younger children when neurodevelopmental interventions typically begin. Most studies are open‐label, small scale, and/or focused on a restricted subgroup of individuals with ASD. There is a need for larger, randomized controlled trials that incorporate neuroimaging in order to develop predictive biomarkers of treatment response and optimize treatment parameters. We contend that until such studies are conducted, we do not have adequate estimates of the safety and efficacy of NIBS interventions in children across the spectrum. Thus, broad off‐label use of these techniques in this population is not supported by currently available evidence. Here we discuss the existing data on the use of NIBS to treat symptoms related to ASD and discuss future directions for the field.

Study authors in this cited reference