Public @autismcrisis posts on Bluesky and Twitter/X

@behaviortank those guidelines are not enforced by the BACB. To claim otherwise, as many behavior analysts do, is problematic--in my view.

Program for high-profile SfN 2010 satellite autism conference informs us that autistics have "proscribed interests" http://j.mp/9r7wnR

Thesis re implicit learning in autism radically suggests that autistic cognitive strengths aren't actually useless http://j.mp/bVYRCe

Interesting comment re early autism screening & intervention from @lilacCourt http://tiny.cc/xo93e via @deevybee

Yes autistics are good at implicit learning, ergo "emphasizing implicit processes" might be a good idea http://bit.ly/a9HISs via @BoraZ

"Does bilateral damage to the human amygdala produce autistic symptoms?" http://j.mp/aSHnqS The answer is no, not in the least (open access)

Found in my blog referrals, classic autism advocacy search words: "what's worse autism or severe autism" (leads to http://j.mp/bLOxBV)

Killing autistic children: "I use a wire on their neck...I don't want my kids that way...I want normal kids." http://j.mp/9xY9mP

.@researchethics a BCBA could not even accurately *name* the guidelines she falsely claims are enforced by the BACB--that was my point.

.@researchethics yes there are "Guidelines for Responsible Conduct" which (setting aside quality) aren't enforced. Not a genuine ethics code