Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 10 Apr 2013 10:27

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Karla K. McGregor, Gwyneth Rost, Rick Arenas, Ashley Farris‐Trimble, Derek Stiles (2013). Children with ASD can use gaze in support of word recognition and learning. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54(7), 745-753. Wiley.

Publication date
10 Apr 2013
Identifier
10.1111/jcpp.12073
Authors
Karla K. McGregor, Gwyneth Rost, Rick Arenas, Ashley Farris‐Trimble, Derek Stiles
Source
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Details
54(7), 745-753
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Background Many children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD ) struggle to understand familiar words and learn unfamiliar words. We explored the extent to which these problems reflect deficient use of probabilistic gaze in the extra‐linguistic context. Method Thirty children with ASD and 43 with typical development (TD ) participated in a spoken word recognition and mapping task. They viewed photographs of a woman behind three objects and simultaneously heard a word. For word recognition, the objects and words were familiar and the woman gazed ahead (neutral), toward the named object (facilitative), or toward an un‐named object (contradictory). For word mapping, the objects and words were unfamiliar and only the neutral and facilitative conditions were employed. The children clicked on the named object, registering accuracy and reaction time. Results Speed of word recognition did not differ between groups but varied with gaze such that responses were fastest in the facilitative condition and slowest in the contradictory condition. Only the ASD group responded slower to low frequency than high‐frequency words. Accuracy of word mapping did not differ between groups, but accuracy varied with gaze with higher performance in the facilitative than neutral condition. Both groups scored above single‐trial chance levels in the neutral condition by tracking cross‐situational information. Only in the ASD group did mapping vary with receptive vocabulary. Conclusions Under laboratory conditions, children with ASD can monitor gaze and judge its reliability as a cue to word meaning as well as typical peers. The use of cross‐situational statistics to support word learning may be problematic for those who have weak language abilities.

Study authors in this cited reference