DOI work
Fetched
Post
crossref
Johnny L. Matson, Alison M. Kozlowski, Megan A. Hattier, Max Horovitz, Megan Sipes
(2012).
DSM-IV vs DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for toddlers with Autism.
Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(3), 185-190.
Informa UK Limited.
- Publication date
-
14 May 2012
- Identifier
-
10.3109/17518423.2012.672341
- Authors
-
Johnny L. Matson,
Alison M. Kozlowski,
Megan A. Hattier,
Max Horovitz,
Megan Sipes
- Source
- Developmental Neurorehabilitation
- Details
- 15(3), 185-190
- Reference type
- article
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Metadata source
- crossref
Abstract
PURPOSE: To evaluate prevalence rates of autism and autism symptomatology in toddlers using DSM-IV vs DSM-5 criteria. METHOD: Two thousand seven hundred and twenty-one toddlers at risk for a developmental disability participated. DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria were applied and overall prevalence using each set of criteria was established. Groups were also compared on BISCUIT-Part 1 scores to determine if groups differed on autism symptomatology. RESULTS: DSM-5 resulted in 47.79% fewer toddlers being diagnosed with ASD compared to those on the DSM-IV. Toddlers diagnosed according to DSM-5 exhibited greater levels of autism symptomatology than those diagnosed with DSM-IV, but the latter group still exhibited significant levels of autism symptomatology. CONCLUSION: The proposed DSM-5 will result in far fewer persons being diagnosed with ASD. These results replicate findings from two previous studies, with older children/adolescents and adults. As a result of these new criteria, far fewer people will qualify for needed autism services.
Study authors in this cited reference