Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 16 May 2012 19:49

Twitter/X DOI work crossref External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Johnny L. Matson, Alison M. Kozlowski, Megan A. Hattier, Max Horovitz, Megan Sipes (2012). DSM-IV vs DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for toddlers with Autism. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 15(3), 185-190. Informa UK Limited.

Publication date
14 May 2012
Identifier
10.3109/17518423.2012.672341
Authors
Johnny L. Matson, Alison M. Kozlowski, Megan A. Hattier, Max Horovitz, Megan Sipes
Source
Developmental Neurorehabilitation
Details
15(3), 185-190
Reference type
article
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate prevalence rates of autism and autism symptomatology in toddlers using DSM-IV vs DSM-5 criteria. METHOD: Two thousand seven hundred and twenty-one toddlers at risk for a developmental disability participated. DSM-IV and DSM-5 criteria were applied and overall prevalence using each set of criteria was established. Groups were also compared on BISCUIT-Part 1 scores to determine if groups differed on autism symptomatology. RESULTS: DSM-5 resulted in 47.79% fewer toddlers being diagnosed with ASD compared to those on the DSM-IV. Toddlers diagnosed according to DSM-5 exhibited greater levels of autism symptomatology than those diagnosed with DSM-IV, but the latter group still exhibited significant levels of autism symptomatology. CONCLUSION: The proposed DSM-5 will result in far fewer persons being diagnosed with ASD. These results replicate findings from two previous studies, with older children/adolescents and adults. As a result of these new criteria, far fewer people will qualify for needed autism services.

Study authors in this cited reference