DOI work
Fetched
Post
crossref
Bérengère Galadriel Digard, Kealan Jones, Fraser Milton, Zoe Foster, Adam Zeman
(2026).
Invisible variations: Associations and subtypes of visual imagery vividness extremes.
Neuropsychologia, 229, 109500.
Elsevier BV.
- Publication date
-
August 2026
- Identifier
-
10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109500
- Authors
-
Bérengère Galadriel Digard,
Kealan Jones,
Fraser Milton,
Zoe Foster,
Adam Zeman
- Source
- Neuropsychologia
- Details
- 229, 109500
- Reference type
- article
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Metadata source
- crossref
Abstract
Visual imagery, the ability to experience the visual features of absent items in our mind’s eye, exists on a continuum ranging from extremely vivid (hyperphantasia) to weak/absent imagery (aphantasia). Existing evidence suggests that these extreme groups are heterogeneous. After re-examining and largely replicating previously reported differences between people with aphantasia and hyperphantasia in 6436 online respondents, we investigate whether the variable features of aphantasia cluster in distinct subtypes. We conducted a latent class analysis with a subset of 3883 respondents who completed key measures of imagery (Vividness of Visual Imagery Questionnaire) and self-reported cognitive experiences (sensory imagery, autobiographical memory, face recognition, spatial navigation). 3 subtypes of aphantasia emerge: 1) a ‘global aphantasia’ subtype with extreme sensory features in most to all sensory modalities; 2) an ‘Aphantasia +’ subtype with both sensory and cognitive features in the domains listed above; and 3) a ‘non-global aphantasia’ subtype with milder uni- or multisensory features. Our findings confirm the heterogeneous nature of aphantasia, with subtypes varying alongside 3 dimensions: number (and type) of sensory modalities experiencing low imagery, the intensity of aphantasia in the concerned sensory modalities (total lack of versus poor imagery), and the presence or absence of additional cognitive difficulties outwith sensory imagery. Together, these findings call for a shift in the theoretical and methodological approaches to aphantasia and imagery research.
Study authors in this cited reference