Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 22 Apr 2026 12:02

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Autistic (vs typical) children show enhanced attention to educational materials in their environment (e.g. "illustrations of the solar system" "times tables grids") journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... but--the authors claim this is bad ("negative" "detrimental") for learning? this must be stopped?

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Elizabeth Jones, Mary Hanley, Jessica Rose Hirst, Emily McDougal, Deborah Michelle Riby (2026). The Effect of the Classroom Sensory Environment on Engagement for Autistic Pupils: Classroom Noise and Classroom Displays. Neurodiversity, 4, 27546330261443570. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
21 Apr 2026
Identifier
10.1177/27546330261443570
Authors
Elizabeth Jones, Mary Hanley, Jessica Rose Hirst, Emily McDougal, Deborah Michelle Riby
Source
Neurodiversity
Details
4, 27546330261443570
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Background Primary school classrooms are busy multi-sensory environments where children engage in important formal learning. Evidence suggests that sensory features of classrooms can negatively impact engagement and learning. This may be particularly important for neurodivergent children with sensory differences, especially autistic children. Some sensory features of the classroom are under teachers’ control, that is, displays. Aims To systematically investigate the impact of sensory classroom features (classroom displays and classroom noise) on engagement by testing the impact on task engagement for autistic and neurotypical children. Sample There were 25 autistic (8–11 years) and 22 neurotypical children (6–11 years). Methods An experiment in which two groups of children (autistic and neurotypical) completed classroom tasks (self-directed reading comprehension) under four experimental sensory conditions (baseline, visual [displays present], audio [classroom noise], and visual and audio) in a ‘mini-classroom’. Task behaviour was video-recorded and coded for analysis. Results Experimental evidence showed that displays can have a detrimental impact on engagement, leading to more off-task behaviour, especially for autistic children. Evidence of the negative impact from classroom noise was not found here, but is discussed in relation to the experimental context. Conclusions This evidence has significant implications for optimising learning for all children, but especially for autistic and neurodivergent children with sensory differences.

Study authors in this cited reference