Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 13 Nov 2025 11:42

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Autistics (vs non-autistics) "are less likely to make errors in self-assessments of their cognitive performance"? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... "findings provide valuable insights into both the cognitive strengths of autistic individuals and the mechanisms underlying metacognitive biases"

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Lorne M. Hartman, Harley Glassman, Braxton L. Hartman (2026). Reduced Susceptibility to the Dunning–Kruger Effect in Autistic Employees. Autism Research, 19(1), e70139. Wiley.

Publication date
12 Nov 2025
Identifier
10.1002/aur.70139
Authors
Lorne M. Hartman, Harley Glassman, Braxton L. Hartman
Source
Autism Research
Details
19(1), e70139
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

ABSTRACT Evidence indicates that autistic individuals are less susceptible to social influence and cognitive biases than non‐autistic individuals. However, no studies have been conducted on the Dunning–Kruger effect (DKE) in autism. The DKE is a cognitive bias in which people with limited expertise in a specific domain overestimate their abilities. The purpose of this study is to compare autistic and non‐autistic employees' self‐assessments of their performance with their objective performance on a popular performance‐based measure of analytic thinking disposition, the CRT (cognitive reflection test). After completing the task, no feedback or clues were provided regarding how well they performed. Participants were then asked to estimate how many questions they answered correctly and compare their performance to other participants by estimating the percentage of peers they outperformed. Results indicated asymmetric calibration of actual versus estimated CRT performance in autistic employees: In the low‐performance group, autistic participants overestimated their abilities less than non‐autistic participants. However, in the high‐performance group, autistic participants underestimated their abilities more than non‐autistic participants. Reduced susceptibility to the DKE highlights potential benefits of autistic employees in the workplace. Theoretical and practical implications consider the intersection of metacognitive awareness, autism, and the DKE in an organizational context.

Study authors in this cited reference