Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 22 May 2025 12:39

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

N=10 neurodivergent researchers sorting out what the neurodiversity movement is & should do? N=3 "strongly agree that neurodiversity is a scientifically meaningless term"? "the scientific status of neurodiversity is a contentious issue..."? journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... autism-relevant, free

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Paul Stenner, Amy Pearson, Steven Kapp, Catherine Watson, Ronit Pressler, Gemma Williams, Hanna Bertilsdotter-Rosqvist, Lill Hultman, et al. (2025). Using Q Methodology, a Group of Neurodivergent Neurodiversity Researchers Ask: What is the Neurodiversity Movement and what should it do?. Neurodiversity, 3, 27546330251329625. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
21 May 2025
Identifier
10.1177/27546330251329625
Authors
Paul Stenner, Amy Pearson, Steven Kapp, Catherine Watson, Ronit Pressler, Gemma Williams, Hanna Bertilsdotter-Rosqvist, Lill Hultman, Rebecca Semmens-Wheeler, Monique Botha
Source
Neurodiversity
Details
3, 27546330251329625
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

This paper describes the eight phases of an innovative procedure for collective and reflexive research about neurodiversity. Structured by Q methodology, this procedure allowed a small group (n = 10) of neurodivergent researchers to identify and discuss our different viewpoints on what neurodiversity means (three viewpoints) and aims for (three viewpoints). The rigour of the procedure was underpinned by the use of Q items collectively self-generated by the group, individual Q sorting of these items to render ‘operant’ each member's viewpoint, Q factor analysis to compare and group these data quantitatively, and group discussion to interpret these factors and to discuss the implications of our differences for the practical future of the neurodiversity movement. The significance of this procedure is that it provides a new way for neurodivergent neurodiversity researchers to collaborate in surfacing and understanding differences and similarities in their views on what the neurodiversity movement is and what it should aim to do. There is a growing focus on neurodiversity across society and it is important to appreciate diversity to avoid misunderstandings around concepts and aims. The variation in viewpoint here demonstrated can inspire future research and help shape the basis for the theoretical discussion informing the movement going forwards.

Study authors in this cited reference