Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 26 Mar 2025 10:44

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

RCT of A-FFIP (an NDBI, i.e. ABA) vs EIAU (early intervention as usual) for young autistic children? COIs acamh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/... A-FFIP "did not improve social communication, cognitive or behavioral outcomes beyond EIAU after 1 year but may improve repetitive behavior and EF"?

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Christine M. Freitag, Marietta Kirchner, Lukas D. Sauer, Solvejg K. Kleber, Leonie Polzer, Naisan Raji, Christian Lemler, Ulrike Fröhlich, et al. (2025). Complex, low‐intensity, individualised naturalistic developmental behavioural intervention in toddlers and pre‐schoolers with autism spectrum disorder: The multicentre, observer‐blind, parallel‐group randomised‐controlled A‐FFIP trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 66(10), 1500-1513. Wiley.

Publication date
26 Mar 2025
Identifier
10.1111/jcpp.14162
Authors
Christine M. Freitag, Marietta Kirchner, Lukas D. Sauer, Solvejg K. Kleber, Leonie Polzer, Naisan Raji, Christian Lemler, Ulrike Fröhlich, Tomasz Jarczok, Julia Geissler, Franziska Radtke, Melanie Ring, Veit Roessner, Regina Taurines, Michelle Noterdaeme, Karoline Teufel, Ziyon Kim, Janina Kitzerow‐Cleven
Source
Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry
Details
66(10), 1500-1513
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Background Naturalistic developmental behavioural interventions (NDBI) may improve social communication in toddlers/pre‐school aged children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). Here, we study efficacy of the low‐intensity, complex NDBI ‘Frankfurt Early Intervention Program for ASD’ (A‐FFIP) over 1 year by a confirmatory phase‐III, prospective, randomised, controlled, parallel‐group study with two treatment arms over four centres. Methods Main inclusion criteria: ASD (DSM‐5), age 24–66 months, developmental quotient >30. Intervention: Manualised A‐FFIP intervention. Control intervention: Early intervention as usual (EIAU). Primary outcome: Change in core ASD symptoms from baseline (T2) to immediate intervention endpoint at 12 months (T6) based on the blindly rated Brief Observation for Communication Change (BOSCC) total score. Statistical analysis: Mixed model for repeated measures with covariates baseline BOSCC‐total, chronological age and centre. Results Between July 2018 and October 2021, N = 134 children with ASD were randomly allocated to intervention (A‐FFIP: n = 68, EIAU: n = 66). Groups did not differ at baseline, with a mean age of 49 (SD 10) months, a mean developmental age of 23.3 (SD 13.6) months and 26 (19.4%) females. The SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic interfered severely with trial procedures. Intention‐to‐treat analysis in the primary analysis set, with at least one postbaseline BOSCC measure (A‐FFIP n = 64, EIAU n = 60), did not find differences in the primary outcome by group (adjusted ES −0.06, 95% CI to −0.24 to 0.11). SARS‐CoV2‐related lockdown led to less improvement across groups. Secondary outcomes showed stronger improvements in parent‐rated repetitive behaviour as well as parent‐ and teacher‐rated executive functions for A‐FFIP versus EIAU. Adverse events were comparable between groups. Conclusions The manualised NDBI program A‐FFIP, which allows individually targeting six core basic abilities and five developmental domains related to longitudinal development in ASD, did not improve social communication, cognitive or behavioural outcomes beyond EIAU after 1 year, but may improve repetitive behaviour and executive function.

Study authors in this cited reference