Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 5 Oct 2024 11:36

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

ABA (ESDM) vs ABA (early behavioral intervention) for very young autistics?--protocol "is responsive to the neurodiversity perspective"? bmcpsychology.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.... note: child outcomes assess typicality (e.g. VABS, BOSCC); & EDI (Emotion Dysregulation Inventory) to assess harms?

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Aubyn C. Stahmer, Sarah Dufek, Sally J. Rogers, Ana-Maria Iosif (2024). Study Protocol for a Cluster, Randomized, Controlled Community Effectiveness Trial of the Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) Compared to Community Early Behavioral Intervention (EBI) in Community Programs serving Young Autistic Children: Partnering for Autism: Learning more to improve Services (PALMS). BMC Psychology, 12(1), 513. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
28 Sep 2024
Identifier
10.1186/s40359-024-02020-0
Authors
Aubyn C. Stahmer, Sarah Dufek, Sally J. Rogers, Ana-Maria Iosif
Source
BMC Psychology
Details
12(1), 513
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Background The rising number of children identified with autism has led to exponential growth in for-profit applied behavior analysis (ABA) agencies and the use of highly structured approaches that may not be developmentally appropriate for young children. Multiple clinical trials support naturalistic developmental behavior interventions (NDBIs) that integrate ABA and developmental science and are considered best practices for young autistic children. The Early Start Denver Model (ESDM) is a comprehensive NDBI shown to improve social communication outcomes for young autistic children in several controlled efficacy studies. However, effectiveness data regarding NDBI use in community-based agencies are limited. Methods This study uses a community-partnered approach to test the effectiveness of ESDM compared to usual early behavioral intervention (EBI) for improving social communication and language in autistic children served by community agencies. This is a hybrid type 1 cluster-randomized controlled trial with 2 conditions: ESDM and EBI. In the intervention group, supervising providers will receive training in ESDM; in the control group, they will continue EBI as usual. We will enroll and randomize 100 supervisors (50 ESDM, 50 EBI) by region. Each supervisor enrolls 3 families of autistic children under age 5 (n = 300) and accompanying behavior technicians (n = 200). The primary outcome is child language and social communication at 6 and 12 months. Secondary outcomes include child adaptive behavior, caregiver use of ESDM strategies, and provider intervention fidelity. Child social motivation and caregiver fidelity will be tested as mediating variables. ESDM implementation determinants will be explored using mixed methods. Discussion This study will contribute novel knowledge on ESDM effectiveness, the variables that mediate and moderate child outcomes, and engagement of its mechanisms in community use. We expect results from this trial to increase community availability of this model and access to high-quality intervention for young autistic children, especially those who depend on publicly funded intervention services. Understanding implementation determinants will aid scale-up of effective models within communities. Trail registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier number NCT06005285. Registered on August 21, 2023. Protocol version Issue date 6 August 2024; Protocol amendment number: 02.

Study authors in this cited reference