Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 4 Oct 2024 12:19

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

"When we are told to expect high levels of control over the environment we become better able to distinguish control from its absence, but also biased to hallucinate a sense of control over uncontrollable outcomes"? www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... in typical adults, autism-relevant, free

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

George Blackburne, Chris D. Frith, Daniel Yon (2025). Communicated priors tune the perception of control. Cognition, 254, 105969. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
January 2025
Identifier
10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105969
Authors
George Blackburne, Chris D. Frith, Daniel Yon
Source
Cognition
Details
254, 105969
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Action allows us to shape the world around us. But to act effectively we need to accurately sense what we can and cannot control. Classic theories across cognitive science suppose that this 'sense of agency' is constructed from the sensorimotor signals we experience as we interact with our surroundings. But these sensorimotor signals are inherently ambiguous, and can provide us with a distorted picture of what we can and cannot influence. Here we investigate one way that agents like us might overcome the inherent ambiguity of these signals: by combining noisy sensorimotor evidence with prior beliefs about control acquired through explicit communication with others. Using novel tools to measure and model control decisions, we find that explicit beliefs about the controllability of the environment alter both the sensitivity and bias of agentic choices; meaning that we are both better at detecting and more biased to feel control when we are told to expect it. These seemingly paradoxical effects on agentic choices can be captured by a computational model where expecting to be in control exaggerates the sensitivity or 'gain' of the mechanisms we use to detect our influence over our surroundings - making us increasingly sensitised to both true and illusory signs of agency. In combination, these results reveal a cognitive and computational mechanism that allows public communication about what we can and cannot influence to reshape our private sense of control.

Study authors in this cited reference