Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 11 Feb 2024 21:57

Back to posts Previous post Next post
Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post
Open original post
View on Bluesky

1 integrated reply by Michelle Dawson

11 Feb 2024 21:59

Note: "a limitation of a concurrent-chains arrangement is that clients could be exposed to interventions repeatedly that may be nonpreferred or aversive"?

View reply on Bluesky

Information about the link integrated into the post

DOI work

Emma M. Auten, Carole Van Camp, Allie B. Ferguson (2024). A review of the concurrent‐chains arrangement to assess intervention choice: 2018–2023. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 57(2), 319-330. Wiley.

More information

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Emma M. Auten, Carole Van Camp, Allie B. Ferguson (2024). A review of the concurrent‐chains arrangement to assess intervention choice: 2018–2023. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 57(2), 319-330. Wiley.

Publication date
February 2024
Identifier
10.1002/jaba.1059
Authors
Emma M. Auten, Carole Van Camp, Allie B. Ferguson
Source
Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis
Details
57(2), 319-330
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract The purpose of this review is to summarize recent literature on the use of concurrent‐chains arrangements in the assessment of preference for interventions (or intervention components) in the applied literature. The types of interventions and participants are described briefly, and procedural variations, ethical considerations, and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Study authors in this cited reference

Open DOI Link to cited source