DOI work
Fetched
Post
crossref
Ann-Kathrin Beck, Daniela Czernochowski, Thomas Lachmann, Bernardo Barahona-Correa, Joana C. Carmo
(2022).
Is the dolphin a fish? ERP evidence for the impact of typicality during early visual processing in ultra-rapid semantic categorization in autism spectrum disorder.
Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders, 14(1), 46.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
- Publication date
-
23 Aug 2022
- Identifier
-
10.1186/s11689-022-09457-7
- Authors
-
Ann-Kathrin Beck,
Daniela Czernochowski,
Thomas Lachmann,
Bernardo Barahona-Correa,
Joana C. Carmo
- Source
- Journal of Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Details
- 14(1), 46
- Reference type
- article
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Metadata source
- crossref
Abstract
Abstract Background Neurotypical individuals categorize items even during ultra-rapid presentations (20 ms; see Thorpe et al. Nature 381: 520, 1996). In cognitively able autistic adults, these semantic categorization processes may be impaired and/or may require additional time, specifically for the categorization of atypical compared to typical items. Here, we investigated how typicality structures influence ultra-rapid categorization in cognitively able autistic and neurotypical male adults. Methods Images representing typical or atypical exemplars of two different categories (food/animals) were presented for 23.5 vs. 82.3 ms (short/long). We analyzed detection rates, reaction times, and the event-related potential components dN150, N1, P2, N2, and P3 for each group. Results Behavioral results suggest slower and less correct responses to atypical compared to typical images. This typicality effect was larger for the category with less distinct boundaries (food) and observed in both groups. However, electrophysiological data indicate a different time course of typicality effects, suggesting that neurotypical adults categorize atypical images based on simple features (P2), whereas cognitively able autistic adults categorize later, based on arbitrary features of atypical images (P3). Conclusions We found evidence that all three factors under investigation — category, typicality, and presentation time — modulated specific aspects of semantic categorization. Additionally, we observed a qualitatively different pattern in the autistic adults, which suggests that they relied on different cognitive processes to complete the task.
Study authors in this cited reference