Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 22 Apr 2022 14:23

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Nicky Daniels, Matthijs Moerkerke, Jean Steyaert, Annelies Bamps, Edward Debbaut, Jellina Prinsen, Tiffany Tang, Stephanie Van der Donck, et al. (2022). Effects of multiple-dose intranasal oxytocin treatment on social responsiveness in children with autism: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. openRxiv.

Publication date
21 Apr 2022
Identifier
10.1101/2022.04.20.22274106
Authors
Nicky Daniels, Matthijs Moerkerke, Jean Steyaert, Annelies Bamps, Edward Debbaut, Jellina Prinsen, Tiffany Tang, Stephanie Van der Donck, Bart Boets, Kaat Alaerts
Reference type
preprint
Publisher
openRxiv
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract In the past decade, intranasal administration of the neuropeptide oxytocin is increasingly explored as a new treatment for reducing the core symptoms of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). The efficacy of continual oxytocin treatment in school-aged children with ASD is, however, not well established. Using a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel design, the current trial explored the effects of four weeks of intranasal oxytocin treatment (12 IU, twice daily) on social functioning in pre-pubertal school-aged children (aged 8-12 years, 61 boys, 16 girls). The double-blind phase was followed by a four-week single-blind extension phase during which all participants received intranasal oxytocin. In the double-blind phase, no treatment-specific effects were identified in the primary outcome assessing social functioning (parent-rated Social Responsiveness Scale), as well as on secondary outcomes assessing repetitive behaviors, anxiety, and attachment. Exploratory moderator analyses revealed that children who received the oxytocin treatment in combination with concomitant psychosocial treatment displayed a greater benefit than those who received psychosocial treatment or oxytocin alone. A modulating effect of parents’ beliefs about allocated treatment was also identified, indicating that parents who believed their child assigned to the active treatment reported greater benefit than those who believed their child received placebo, particularly in the actual oxytocin group. Finally, participants who were allocated to receive the placebo treatment during the double-blind phase of the trial and later crossed-over to receive the active treatment during the single-blind extension phase, displayed a significant within-group improvement in social responsiveness, over and above the placebo-induced improvements noted in the first phase. While no overall treatment-specific improvements were identified, our results provide important indications that clinical efficacy can be augmented when oxytocin administration is paired with targeted psychosocial interventions that similarly stimulate socio-communicative behaviors. Future trials are urged to further elucidate the potential of embedding oxytocin treatment within a socially stimulating context.

Study authors in this cited reference