Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 15 Jan 2022 05:25

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Kyongje Sung, Hanna Glazer, Jessica O’Grady, Mindy L. McEntee, Laura Bosley, Dana Boatman Reich, Barry Gordon (2022). Measuring visual electrophysiological responses in individuals with low-functioning autism: a feasibility and pilot study. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 8(1), 7. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
14 Jan 2022
Identifier
10.1186/s40814-021-00960-7
Authors
Kyongje Sung, Hanna Glazer, Jessica O’Grady, Mindy L. McEntee, Laura Bosley, Dana Boatman Reich, Barry Gordon
Source
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Details
8(1), 7
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Background Although visual abnormalities are considered common in individuals with autism spectrum disorders, the associated electrophysiological markers have remained elusive. One impediment has been that methodological challenges often preclude testing individuals with low-functioning autism (LFA). Methods In this feasibility and pilot study, we tested a hybrid visual evoked potential paradigm tailored to individuals with LFA that combines passively presented visual stimuli to elicit scalp-recorded evoked responses with a behavioral paradigm to maintain visual attention. We conducted a pilot study to explore differences in visual evoked response patterns across three groups: individuals with LFA, with high-functioning autism (HFA), and with typical development. Results All participants with LFA met criteria for study feasibility by completing the recordings and producing measurable cortical evoked waveform responses. The LFA group had longer (delayed) cortical response latencies on average as compared with the HFA and typical development groups. We also observed group differences in visually induced alpha spectral power: the LFA group showed little to no prestimulus alpha activity in contrast to the HFA and typical development groups that showed increased prestimulus alpha activity. This observation was confirmed by the bootstrapped confidence intervals, suggesting that the absence of prestimulus alpha power may be a potential electrophysiological marker of LFA. Conclusion Our results confirm the utility of tailoring visual electrophysiology paradigms to individuals with LFA in order to facilitate inclusion of individuals across the autism spectrum in studies of visual processing.

Study authors in this cited reference