Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 26 Nov 2021 14:17

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Alex O. Holcombe (2022). Ad hominem rhetoric in scientific psychology. British Journal of Psychology, 113(2), 434-454. Wiley.

Publication date
24 Nov 2021
Identifier
10.1111/bjop.12541
Authors
Alex O. Holcombe
Source
British Journal of Psychology
Details
113(2), 434-454
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Ad hominem discourse is largely prohibited in scientific journals. Historically, this prohibition restricted the dissemination of ad hominem discussion, but during the last decade, blogs and social media platforms became popular among researchers. With the use of social media now entrenched among researchers, there are important questions about the role of ad hominems. Ad hominems and other forms of strong criticism became particularly evident in online discussions associated with the recent replication crisis in psychology. Here, these discussions, and a few incidences of ad hominems in journal articles, are situated in the broader history of science. It is argued that explicit codes of conduct should be considered to curb certain kinds of ad hominem comments in certain fora, but that some ad hominem discussions have an important role to play in a healthier science.

Study authors in this cited reference