Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 13 Nov 2021 04:20

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

David Alais, Yiben Xu, Susan G. Wardle, Jessica Taubert (2021). A shared mechanism for facial expression in human faces and face pareidolia. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 288(1954), 20210966. The Royal Society.

Publication date
7 Jul 2021
Identifier
10.1098/rspb.2021.0966
Authors
David Alais, Yiben Xu, Susan G. Wardle, Jessica Taubert
Source
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Details
288(1954), 20210966
Reference type
article
Publisher
The Royal Society
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Facial expressions are vital for social communication, yet the underlying mechanisms are still being discovered. Illusory faces perceived in objects (face pareidolia) are errors of face detection that share some neural mechanisms with human face processing. However, it is unknown whether expression in illusory faces engages the same mechanisms as human faces. Here, using a serial dependence paradigm, we investigated whether illusory and human faces share a common expression mechanism. First, we found that images of face pareidolia are reliably rated for expression, within and between observers, despite varying greatly in visual features. Second, they exhibit positive serial dependence for perceived facial expression, meaning an illusory face (happy or angry) is perceived as more similar in expression to the preceding one, just as seen for human faces. This suggests illusory and human faces engage similar mechanisms of temporal continuity. Third, we found robust cross-domain serial dependence of perceived expression between illusory and human faces when they were interleaved, with serial effects larger when illusory faces preceded human faces than the reverse. Together, the results support a shared mechanism for facial expression between human faces and illusory faces and suggest that expression processing is not tightly bound to human facial features.

Study authors in this cited reference