Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 29 Oct 2021 11:30

Twitter/X DOI work crossref External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Dominique Girard, Valérie Courchesne, Janie Degré‐Pelletier, Camille Letendre, Isabelle Soulières (2022). Assessing global developmental delay across instruments in minimally verbal preschool autistic children: The importance of a multi‐method and multi‐informant approach. Autism Research, 15(1), 103-116. Wiley.

Publication date
27 Oct 2021
Identifier
10.1002/aur.2630
Authors
Dominique Girard, Valérie Courchesne, Janie Degré‐Pelletier, Camille Letendre, Isabelle Soulières
Source
Autism Research
Details
15(1), 103-116
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Intellectual assessment in preschool autistic children bears many challenges, particularly for those who have lower language and/or cognitive abilities. These challenges often result in underestimation of their potential or exclusion from research studies. Understanding how different instruments and definitions used to identify autistic preschool children with global developmental delay (GDD) affect sample composition is critical to advance research on this understudied clinical population. This study set out to examine the extent to which using different instruments to define GDD affects sample composition and whether different definitions affect resultant cognitive and adaptive profiles. Data from the Mullen Scales of Early Learning and the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales—Second Edition, a parent‐report tool, were analyzed in a sample of 64 autistic and 73 neurotypical children (28–69 months). Our results highlight that cognitive assessment alone should not be used in clinical or research practices to infer a comorbid diagnosis of GDD, as it might lead to underestimating autistic children's potential. Instead, using both adaptive and cognitive levels as a stratification method to create subgroups of children with and without GDD might be a promising approach to adequately differentiate them, with less risk of underestimating them.

Study authors in this cited reference