DOI work
Fetched
Post
crossref
Marlee M. Vandewouw, Kristina Safar, Sarah I. Mossad, Julie Lu, Jason P. Lerch, Evdokia Anagnostou, Margot J. Taylor
(2021).
Do shapes have feelings? Social attribution in children with autism spectrum disorder and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 493.
Springer Science and Business Media LLC.
- Publication date
-
25 Sep 2021
- Identifier
-
10.1038/s41398-021-01625-y
- Authors
-
Marlee M. Vandewouw,
Kristina Safar,
Sarah I. Mossad,
Julie Lu,
Jason P. Lerch,
Evdokia Anagnostou,
Margot J. Taylor
- Source
- Translational Psychiatry
- Details
- 11(1), 493
- Reference type
- article
- Publisher
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC
- Metadata source
- crossref
Abstract
Abstract Theory of mind (ToM) deficits are common in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDDs), such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), which contribute to their social and cognitive difficulties. The social attribution task (SAT) involves geometrical shapes moving in patterns that depict social interactions and is known to recruit brain regions from the classic ToM network. To better understand ToM in ASD and ADHD children, we examined the neural correlates using the SAT and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) in a cohort of 200 children: ASD (N = 76), ADHD (N = 74) and typically developing (TD; N = 50) (4–19 years). In the scanner, participants were presented with SAT videos corresponding to social help, social threat, and random conditions. Contrasting social vs. random, the ASD compared with TD children showed atypical activation in ToM brain areas—the middle temporal and anterior cingulate gyri. In the social help vs. social threat condition, atypical activation of the bilateral middle cingulate and right supramarginal and superior temporal gyri was shared across the NDD children, with between-diagnosis differences only being observed in the right fusiform. Data-driven subgrouping identified two distinct subgroups spanning all groups that differed in both their clinical characteristics and brain–behaviour relations with ToM ability.
Study authors in this cited reference