Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 7 Sep 2021 15:43

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

1 integrated reply by Michelle Dawson

7 Sep 2021 15:45

Note: "when explicitly asked, both groups tended to prefer objects to faces, but this tendency was less pronounced in autistic participants"

View reply on Twitter/X

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Fabien Vinckier, Mathias Pessiglione, Baudouin Forgeot d’Arc (2021). Absence of covert face valuation in Autism. Translational Psychiatry, 11(1), 463. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
7 Sep 2021
Identifier
10.1038/s41398-021-01551-z
Authors
Fabien Vinckier, Mathias Pessiglione, Baudouin Forgeot d’Arc
Source
Translational Psychiatry
Details
11(1), 463
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Autism is a neurodevelopmental condition defined on clinical criteria related to diminished social reciprocity and stereotyped behavior. An influential view explains autism as a social motivation disorder characterized by less attention paid to the social environment and less pleasure experienced with social rewards. However, experimental attempts to validate this theory, by testing the impact of social reward on behavioral choice and brain activity, has yielded mixed results, possibly due to variations in how explicit instructions were about task goals. Here, we specified the putative motivation deficit as an absence of spontaneous valuation in the social domain, unexplained by inattention and correctible by explicit instruction. Since such deficit cannot be assessed with behavioral measures, we used functional neuroimaging (fMRI) to readout covert subjective values, assigned to social and nonsocial stimuli (faces and objects), either explicitly asked to participants (during a likeability judgment task) or not (during age or size estimation tasks). Value-related neural activity observed for objects, or for faces under explicit instructions, was very similar in autistic and control participants, with an activation peak in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex (vmPFC), known as a key node of the brain valuation system. The only difference observed in autistic participants was an absence of the spontaneous valuation normally triggered by faces, even when they were attended for age estimation. Our findings, therefore, suggest that in autism, social stimuli might fail to trigger the automatic activation of the brain valuation system.

Study authors in this cited reference