Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 16 Jul 2021 11:10

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Andrew Ortony (2022). Are All “Basic Emotions” Emotions? A Problem for the (Basic) Emotions Construct. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 41-61. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
15 Jul 2021
Identifier
10.1177/1745691620985415
Authors
Andrew Ortony
Source
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Details
17(1), 41-61
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Despite decades of challenges to the idea that a small number of emotions enjoys the special status of “basic emotions,” the idea continues to have considerable influence in psychology and beyond. However, different theorists have proposed substantially different lists of basic emotions, which suggests that there exists no stable criterion of basicness. To some extent, the basic-emotions enterprise is bedeviled by an overreliance on English affective terms, but there also lurks a more serious problem—the lack of agreement as to what emotions are. To address this problem, three necessary conditions are proposed as a minimal requirement for a mental state to be an emotion. A detailed analysis of surprise, a widely accepted basic emotion, reveals that surprise violates even this minimal test, raising the possibility that it and perhaps other would-be basic emotions might not be emotions at all. An approach that combines ideas such as undifferentiated affect and cognitive appraisal is briefly proposed as a way of theorizing about emotions that is less dependent on the vagaries of language and incoherent notions of basic emotions. Finally, it is suggested that the perennial question of what an emotion is should be given more serious attention.

Study authors in this cited reference