Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 10 Jul 2021 04:07

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Cecilia Heyes, Caroline Catmur (2022). What Happened to Mirror Neurons?. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 17(1), 153-168. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
9 Jul 2021
Identifier
10.1177/1745691621990638
Authors
Cecilia Heyes, Caroline Catmur
Source
Perspectives on Psychological Science
Details
17(1), 153-168
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Ten years ago, Perspectives in Psychological Science published the Mirror Neuron Forum, in which authors debated the role of mirror neurons in action understanding, speech, imitation, and autism and asked whether mirror neurons are acquired through visual-motor learning. Subsequent research on these themes has made significant advances, which should encourage further, more systematic research. For action understanding, multivoxel pattern analysis, patient studies, and brain stimulation suggest that mirror-neuron brain areas contribute to low-level processing of observed actions (e.g., distinguishing types of grip) but not to high-level action interpretation (e.g., inferring actors’ intentions). In the area of speech perception, although it remains unclear whether mirror neurons play a specific, causal role in speech perception, there is compelling evidence for the involvement of the motor system in the discrimination of speech in perceptually noisy conditions. For imitation, there is strong evidence from patient, brain-stimulation, and brain-imaging studies that mirror-neuron brain areas play a causal role in copying of body movement topography. In the area of autism, studies using behavioral and neurological measures have tried and failed to find evidence supporting the “broken-mirror theory” of autism. Furthermore, research on the origin of mirror neurons has confirmed the importance of domain-general visual-motor associative learning rather than canalized visual-motor learning, or motor learning alone.

Study authors in this cited reference