Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 19 May 2021 11:54

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Laura S. Daedelow, Anne Beck, Lydia Romund, Lea Mascarell-Maricic, Isabel Dziobek, Nina Romanczuk-Seiferth, Torsten Wüstenberg, Andreas Heinz (2021). Neural correlates of RDoC-specific cognitive processes in a high-functional autistic patient: a statistically validated case report. Journal of Neural Transmission, 128(6), 845-859. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
18 May 2021
Identifier
10.1007/s00702-021-02352-w
Authors
Laura S. Daedelow, Anne Beck, Lydia Romund, Lea Mascarell-Maricic, Isabel Dziobek, Nina Romanczuk-Seiferth, Torsten Wüstenberg, Andreas Heinz
Source
Journal of Neural Transmission
Details
128(6), 845-859
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract The level of functioning of individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) varies widely. To better understand the neurobiological mechanism associated with high-functioning ASD, we studied the rare case of a female patient with an exceptional professional career in the highly competitive academic field of Mathematics. According to the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) approach, which proposes to describe the basic dimensions of functioning by integrating different levels of information, we conducted four fMRI experiments targeting the (1) social processes domain (Theory of mind (ToM) and face matching), (2) positive valence domain (reward processing), and (3) cognitive domain (N-back). Patient’s data were compared to data of 14 healthy controls (HC). Additionally, we assessed the subjective experience of our case during the experiments. The patient showed increased response times during face matching and achieved a higher total gain in the Reward task, whereas her performance in N-back and ToM was similar to HC. Her brain function differed mainly in the positive valence and cognitive domains. During reward processing, she showed reduced activity in a left-hemispheric frontal network and cortical midline structures but increased connectivity within this network. During the working memory task patients’ brain activity and connectivity in left-hemispheric temporo-frontal regions were elevated. In the ToM task, activity in posterior cingulate cortex and temporo-parietal junction was reduced. We suggest that the high level of functioning in our patient is rather related to the effects in brain connectivity than to local cortical information processing and that subjective report provides a fruitful framework for interpretation.

Study authors in this cited reference