Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 16 Apr 2021 05:40

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Allison Jack, Catherine A W Sullivan, Elizabeth Aylward, Susan Y Bookheimer, Mirella Dapretto, Nadine Gaab, John D Van Horn, Jeffrey Eilbott, et al. (2021). A neurogenetic analysis of female autism. Brain, 144(6), 1911-1926. Oxford University Press (OUP).

Publication date
16 Apr 2021
Identifier
10.1093/brain/awab064
Authors
Allison Jack, Catherine A W Sullivan, Elizabeth Aylward, Susan Y Bookheimer, Mirella Dapretto, Nadine Gaab, John D Van Horn, Jeffrey Eilbott, Zachary Jacokes, Carinna M Torgerson, Raphael A Bernier, Daniel H Geschwind, James C McPartland, Charles A Nelson, Sara J Webb, Kevin A Pelphrey, Abha R Gupta, the GENDAAR Consortium, Raphael A Bernier, James C McPartland, Pamela Ventola, Anna Kresse, Emily Neuhaus, Sarah Corrigan, Julie Wolf, Nicole McDonald, Katy Ankenman, Sara J Webb, Shafali Jeste, Charles A Nelson, Adam Naples, Erin Libsack, Kevin A Pelphrey, Elizabeth Aylward, Susan Y Bookheimer, Nadine Gaab, Mirella Dapretto, John D Van Horn, Allison Jack, Desiree Guilford, Carinna Torgerson, Olivia Welker, Daniel H Geschwind, Abha R Gupta, Catherine A W Sullivan, Jennifer K Lowe, Zachary Jacokes, Erin MacDonnell, Heidi Tsapelas, Dianna Depedro-Mercier, Cara M Keifer, Pamela Ventola
Source
Brain
Details
144(6), 1911-1926
Reference type
article
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Females versus males are less frequently diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), and while understanding sex differences is critical to delineating the systems biology of the condition, female ASD is understudied. We integrated functional MRI and genetic data in a sex-balanced sample of ASD and typically developing youth (8–17 years old) to characterize female-specific pathways of ASD risk. Our primary objectives were to: (i) characterize female ASD (n = 45) brain response to human motion, relative to matched typically developing female youth (n = 45); and (ii) evaluate whether genetic data could provide further insight into the potential relevance of these brain functional differences. For our first objective we found that ASD females showed markedly reduced response versus typically developing females, particularly in sensorimotor, striatal, and frontal regions. This difference between ASD and typically developing females does not resemble differences between ASD (n = 47) and typically developing males (n = 47), even though neural response did not significantly differ between female and male ASD. For our second objective, we found that ASD females (n = 61), versus males (n = 66), showed larger median size of rare copy number variants containing gene(s) expressed in early life (10 postconceptual weeks to 2 years) in regions implicated by the typically developing female > female functional MRI contrast. Post hoc analyses suggested this difference was primarily driven by copy number variants containing gene(s) expressed in striatum. This striatal finding was reproducible among n = 2075 probands (291 female) from an independent cohort. Together, our findings suggest that striatal impacts may contribute to pathways of risk in female ASD and advocate caution in drawing conclusions regarding female ASD based on male-predominant cohorts.

Study authors in this cited reference