DOI work
Fetched
Post
crossref
Iti Arora, Alessio Bellato, Danielle Ropar, Chris Hollis, Madeleine J. Groom
(2021).
Is autonomic function during resting-state atypical in Autism: A systematic review of evidence.
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 125, 417-441.
Elsevier BV.
- Publication date
-
June 2021
- Identifier
-
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.02.041
- Authors
-
Iti Arora,
Alessio Bellato,
Danielle Ropar,
Chris Hollis,
Madeleine J. Groom
- Source
- Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
- Details
- 125, 417-441
- Reference type
- article
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Metadata source
- crossref
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Theories of differences in resting-state arousal in autistic individuals are influential. Differences in arousal during resting-state would impact engagement and adaptation to the environment, having a cascading effect on development of attentional and social skills. OBJECTIVES: We systematically evaluated the evidence for differences in measures of autonomic arousal (heart rate, pupillometry or electrodermal activity) during resting-state in autistic individuals; to understand whether certain contextual or methodological factors impact reports of such differences. DATA SOURCES: We searched PsycInfo, MEDLINE and EMBASE databases for papers published until 16th May 2019. Of 1207 titles initially identified, 60 met inclusion criteria. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Of the 51 studies that investigated group differences between neurotypical and autistic participants, 60.8 % found evidence of group differences. While findings of hyperarousal were more common, particularly using indices of parasympathetic function, findings of hypo-arousal and autonomic dysregulation were also consistently present. Importantly, experimental context played a role in revealing such differences. The evidence is discussed with regard to important methodological factors and implications for future research are described.
Study authors in this cited reference