Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 12 Feb 2021 11:01

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Rachel A. Clutterbuck, Mitchell J. Callan, Emily C. Taylor, Lucy A. Livingston, Punit Shah (2021). Development and validation of the Four-Item Mentalising Index.. Psychological Assessment, 33(7), 629-636. American Psychological Association (APA).

Publication date
July 2021
Identifier
10.1037/pas0001004
Authors
Rachel A. Clutterbuck, Mitchell J. Callan, Emily C. Taylor, Lucy A. Livingston, Punit Shah
Source
Psychological Assessment
Details
33(7), 629-636
Reference type
article
Publisher
American Psychological Association (APA)
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Mentalising, also known as "Theory of Mind", is the ability to understand and infer the cognitions of others, such as their perceptions, intentions, and beliefs. Although several tools have been designed to measure mentalising in adults, there exist methodological and practical limitations. Many of the existing measures conflate mentalising with similar constructs (e.g., empathy), and most are lengthy measures that are unsuitable for large population-based studies and clinical practice. These issues are currently hampering clinical and non-clinical investigations into mentalising and related social-cognitive abilities. Drawing on questionnaire measures of social cognition, we conceived a self-report mentalising scale, the Four-Item Mentalising Index (FIMI; Studies 1a and b). The FIMI was developed through a series of studies examining its factor structure and reliability (Studies 2a and b) and by testing its construct validity against a cognitive mentalising task, autistic traits, and comparing scores in autistic and non-autistic people (Studies 3a and b). Together, we demonstrate that the FIMI is a conceptually and methodologically robust tool for measuring mentalising ability in the general population, including autistic and non-autistic people. Future research directions and practical (clinical) applications of the scale are discussed, with a focus on improving understanding and management of (a)typical mentalising ability. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Study authors in this cited reference