Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 14 Dec 2020 15:32

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Eunji Chong, Elysha Clark-Whitney, Audrey Southerland, Elizabeth Stubbs, Chanel Miller, Eliana L. Ajodan, Melanie R. Silverman, Catherine Lord, et al. (2020). Detection of eye contact with deep neural networks is as accurate as human experts. Nature Communications, 11(1), 6386. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
14 Dec 2020
Identifier
10.1038/s41467-020-19712-x
Authors
Eunji Chong, Elysha Clark-Whitney, Audrey Southerland, Elizabeth Stubbs, Chanel Miller, Eliana L. Ajodan, Melanie R. Silverman, Catherine Lord, Agata Rozga, Rebecca M. Jones, James M. Rehg
Source
Nature Communications
Details
11(1), 6386
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Eye contact is among the most primary means of social communication used by humans. Quantification of eye contact is valuable as a part of the analysis of social roles and communication skills, and for clinical screening. Estimating a subject’s looking direction is a challenging task, but eye contact can be effectively captured by a wearable point-of-view camera which provides a unique viewpoint. While moments of eye contact from this viewpoint can be hand-coded, such a process tends to be laborious and subjective. In this work, we develop a deep neural network model to automatically detect eye contact in egocentric video. It is the first to achieve accuracy equivalent to that of human experts. We train a deep convolutional network using a dataset of 4,339,879 annotated images, consisting of 103 subjects with diverse demographic backgrounds. 57 subjects have a diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder. The network achieves overall precision of 0.936 and recall of 0.943 on 18 validation subjects, and its performance is on par with 10 trained human coders with a mean precision 0.918 and recall 0.946. Our method will be instrumental in gaze behavior analysis by serving as a scalable, objective, and accessible tool for clinicians and researchers.

Study authors in this cited reference