Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 14 Sep 2020 03:44

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Rebecca J. Hirst, David P. McGovern, Annalisa Setti, Ladan Shams, Fiona N. Newell (2020). What you see is what you hear: Twenty years of research using the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 118, 759-774. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
November 2020
Identifier
10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.09.006
Authors
Rebecca J. Hirst, David P. McGovern, Annalisa Setti, Ladan Shams, Fiona N. Newell
Source
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Details
118, 759-774
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

In the Sound-Induced Flash Illusion (SIFI) sound dramatically alters visual perception, as presenting a single flash with two beeps results in the perception of two flashes. In this comprehensive review, we synthesise 20 years of research using the SIFI, from over 100 studies. We discuss the neural and computational principles governing this illusion and examine the influence of perceptual experience, development, ageing and clinical conditions. Convergent findings show that the SIFI results from optimal integration and probabilistic inference and directly reflects crossmodal interactions in the temporal domain. Its neural basis lies in early modulation of visual cortex by auditory and multisensory regions. The SIFI shows increasingly strong potential as an efficient tool for measuring multisensory processing. Greater harmonisation across studies is now required to maximise this potential. We therefore propose considerations for researchers relating to choice of stimulus parameters and signpost directions for future research.

Study authors in this cited reference