Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 25/04/2026 12:01

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Younger students in a grade are "more likely to be classified with SEN" "SEN status often persists and shapes students’ educational trajectories through lowered academic expectations, differentiated learning goals, and even... segregated settings" journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... autism-relevant

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Janka Goldan, Franz G. Westermaier (2026). Does the Early Bird Catch the Label? Relative Age Effects in the Assessment of Special Educational Needs and ADHD: Evidence from Germany. Exceptional Children, 00144029261441922. SAGE Publications.

Date de publication
20/04/2026
Identifiant
10.1177/00144029261441922
Auteurs
Janka Goldan, Franz G. Westermaier
Source
Exceptional Children
Détails
00144029261441922
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
SAGE Publications
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

This study investigates the causal effect of relative age at school entry on the likelihood of being identified with special educational needs (SEN) or diagnosed with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in Germany. Drawing on representative data from the National Assessment Studies (IQB) for Grades 4 and 9, we use a two-stage least squares (2SLS) instrumental variable approach, leveraging exogenous variation in school starting age created by state-specific enrollment cutoff dates. Results indicate that relatively younger students within a grade cohort are significantly more likely to be classified with SEN, particularly in the domains of learning and developmental disorders, with effects being more pronounced in Grade 9 than in Grade 4. Similarly, we find robust evidence of a relative age effect on ADHD diagnoses in Grade 4, although this effect diminishes by Grade 9. The findings suggest that age-related maturity differences systematically influence assessment and diagnostic decisions. Our results highlight the need for developmentally sensitive and bias-mitigating assessment practices that do not rely solely on teacher judgments, in order to avoid misclassification and ensure educational equity.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée