Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 08/10/2024 12:32

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

More ABA (planned 15-20 hrs/wk; actual 5.8-19.6) vs less ABA (planned 5-10 hrs/wk; actual 1.4-9.3) for young autistic children?--small RCT (big COIs) finds no group differences on reported outcomes onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... note: planned "weeks in treatment" was 24; actual was 2-24

Voir sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Cynthia Anderson, Samantha Hochheimer, Zachary Warren, Eric Butter, Susan L. Hyman, Hongyue Wang, Lisa Wallace, Lynne Levato, et al. (2024). Comparative effectiveness trial: Modular behavior approach for young autistic children compared to comprehensive behavioral intervention. Autism Research, 17(11), 2430-2446. Wiley.

Date de publication
07/10/2024
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.3240
Auteurs
Cynthia Anderson, Samantha Hochheimer, Zachary Warren, Eric Butter, Susan L. Hyman, Hongyue Wang, Lisa Wallace, Lynne Levato, Ryan Martin, Kevin G. Stephenson, Megan Norris, Wynn Jacqueline, Tristram Smith, Cynthia R. Johnson
Source
Autism Research
Détails
17(11), 2430-2446
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract This 24‐week single‐blind trial tested a modular approach for young autistic children (MAYAC) that was delivered for fewer hours per week and modified based on child progress and parental input compared to comprehensive behavioral intervention treatment as usual (CBI, TAU). Participants were autistic children, ages 18–60 months of age. MAYAC was initially 5 h of intervention per week, one of which was parent training and the other four direct therapy focusing on social communication and engagement, but additional modules could be added for up to 10 h per week. Comprehensive behavior intervention was delivered for ≥15 h per week. Outcome measures included the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales; VABS, the Ohio Autism Clinical Improvement Scale – Autism Severity; OACIS – AS and the Pervasive Developmental Disorder Behavior Inventory – Parent; PDDBI‐P. Implementation and parent satisfaction measures were also collected. Fifty‐six children, mean age of 34 months, were randomized. Within‐group analysis revealed significant improvements from baseline to week 24 for both MAYAC (p 95%) as was parent satisfaction. Findings from this small trial are promising and suggest MAYAC may be an alternative for some young autistic children and their families to CBI, TAU.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée