Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 06/08/2024 12:31

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Dylan Cooper, Shelby Frisbie, Shufang Wang, Jonas Ventimiglia, Vicki Gibbs, Abigail M. A. Love, Melanie Mogavero, Teal W. Benevides, et al. (2024). What do we know about autism and policing globally? Preliminary findings from an international effort to examine autism and the criminal justice system. Autism Research, 17(10), 2133-2143. Wiley.

Date de publication
05/08/2024
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.3203
Auteurs
Dylan Cooper, Shelby Frisbie, Shufang Wang, Jonas Ventimiglia, Vicki Gibbs, Abigail M. A. Love, Melanie Mogavero, Teal W. Benevides, Jordan M. Hyatt, Kate Hooven, Icylee Basketbill, Lindsay Shea
Source
Autism Research
Détails
17(10), 2133-2143
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Research has demonstrated that autistic individuals have higher rates of police contact, however, research has seldom explored the fundamental reasons for these interactions and how this might vary across international contexts. To remedy this, the Global Autism and Criminal Justice Consortium created and disseminated the Global Criminal Justice Survey. Descriptive statistics of survey respondents with and without police contact were compared to glean differential characteristics. Frequency and type of recent police interactions (within the last 5 years) among autistic individuals were also examined to better contextualize the reasons that autistic individuals encounter police. Study findings indicated that across a global sample (i.e., North America, Scandinavia, Europe, and Oceania) nearly half of all autistic individuals had an interaction with police and that those with a history of police contact were usually older, had higher educational qualifications, and were more likely to have a co‐occurring mental health or developmental disorder. Among types of interactions, noncriminal encounters, such as welfare checks, traffic incidents, wandering, and behaviors associated with autism, were most common, followed by autistic individuals alleging a crime was committed against them. These findings offer important directions for future research and for targeted policy responses that can address the unique needs of autistic individuals within the justice system.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée