Publication avec DOI
Récupéré
Publication
crossref
Anna Catharina V. Armond, Kelly D. Cobey, David Moher
(2024).
Research Integrity definitions and challenges.
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 171, 111367.
Elsevier BV.
- Date de publication
-
juillet 2024
- Identifiant
-
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2024.111367
- Auteurs
-
Anna Catharina V. Armond,
Kelly D. Cobey,
David Moher
- Source
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Détails
- 171, 111367
- Type de référence
- article
- Éditeur
- Elsevier BV
- Source de métadonnées
- crossref
Résumé
Research integrity is guided by a set of principles to ensure research reliability and rigor. It serves as a pillar to uphold society's trust in science and foster scientific progress. However, over the past 2 decades, a surge in research integrity concerns, including fraudulent research, reproducibility challenges, and questionable practices, has raised critical questions about the reliability of scientific outputs, particularly in biomedical research. In the biomedical sciences, any breaches in research integrity could potentially lead to a domino effect impacting patient care, medical interventions, and the broader implementation of healthcare policies. Addressing these breaches requires measures such as rigorous research methods, transparent reporting, and changing the research culture. Institutional support through clear guidelines, robust training, and mentorship is crucial to fostering a culture of research integrity. However, structural and institutional factors, including research incentives and recognition systems, play an important role in research behavior. Therefore, promoting research integrity demands a collective effort from all stakeholders to maintain public trust in the scientific community and ensure the reliability of science. Here we discuss some definitions and principles, the implications for biomedical sciences, and propose actionable steps to foster research integrity.
Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée