Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 04/03/2024 10:35

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Emma K. Ward, Jan K. Buitelaar, Sabine Hunnius (2024). Autistic and nonautistic adolescents do not differ in adaptation to gaze direction. Autism Research, 17(5), 1001-1015. Wiley.

Date de publication
03/03/2024
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.3118
Auteurs
Emma K. Ward, Jan K. Buitelaar, Sabine Hunnius
Source
Autism Research
Détails
17(5), 1001-1015
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Predictive processing accounts of autism posit that autistic individuals' perception is less biased by expectations than nonautistic individuals', perhaps through stronger precision‐weighting of prediction errors. Since precision‐weighting is fundamental to all information processing, under this theory, the differences between autistic and nonautistic individuals should be domain‐general and observable in both behavior and brain responses. This study used EEG, behavioral responses, and eye‐tracking co‐registration during gaze‐direction adaptation, to investigate whether increased precision‐weighting of prediction errors is evident through smaller adaptation after‐effects in autistic adolescents compared with nonautistic peers. Multilevel modeling showed that autistic and nonautistic adolescents' responses were consistent with behavioral adaptation, with Bayesian statistics providing extremely strong evidence for the absence of a group difference. Cluster‐based permutation testing of ERP responses did not show the expected adaptation after‐effect but did show habituation to repeated stimulus presentation, and no group difference was detected, a result not consistent with the theoretical account. Combined with the few other available studies, the current findings raise challenges for the theory, suggesting no fundamental difference in precision‐weighting of prediction errors in autism.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée