Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 02/03/2024 13:26

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

1 réponse intégrée de Michelle Dawson

02/03/2024 13:28

Note: "When we do not focus on the subgroups, findings from the overall autism group show that most characteristics remain similar with age, some difficulties decrease (i.e., social interaction, communication, and worries), whereas none seem to increase with age"

Voir la réponse sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Tulsi A. Radhoe, Joost A. Agelink van Rentergem, Carolien Torenvliet, Annabeth P. Groenman, Wikke J. van der Putten, Hilde M. Geurts (2024). The clinical relevance of subgroups of autistic adults: Stability and predictive value. Autism Research, 17(4), 747-760. Wiley.

Date de publication
mars 2024
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.3116
Auteurs
Tulsi A. Radhoe, Joost A. Agelink van Rentergem, Carolien Torenvliet, Annabeth P. Groenman, Wikke J. van der Putten, Hilde M. Geurts
Source
Autism Research
Détails
17(4), 747-760
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Autism in adulthood is characterized by heterogeneity, complicating the provision of tailored support. In previous work, we aimed to capture this heterogeneity by determining subgroups of autistic adults that differed in clinical outcomes: cognitive failures, psychological difficulties, and quality of life (QoL). Two subgroups were identified: a “Feelings of Low Grip” subgroup characterized by experiencing a lower sense of mastery and a higher susceptibility to difficulties in daily life, and a “Feelings of High Grip” subgroup characterized by a higher sense of mastery and lower susceptibility to difficulties in daily life. The current pre‐registered study involves a longitudinal extension to determine (a) stability and (b) predictive value of the previously identified two subgroups. Subgroups were identified using community detection based on 14 self‐report measures related to demographic, psychological, and lifestyle characteristics in two samples (aged 31–86 years) that were analyzed separately: Sample 1 (N Autism = 80) measured 5 years after baseline and Sample 2 (N Autism = 241, N Comparison = 211) measured 2 years after baseline. The stability over time was assessed based on (a) the number of subgroups, (b) subgroup profiles, and (c) subgroup membership. Predictive validity was assessed for cognitive failures, psychological difficulties, and QoL. Results indicated that autistic and non‐autistic adults formed distinct subgroups. Within both autism samples, the two previously identified autism subgroups were replicated at follow‐up. Subgroup profiles were similar for >50% of the variables at two‐year follow‐up, and 21% at five‐year follow‐up. Moreover, ≥76% remained in the same subgroup at two‐year follow‐up, and ≥ 57% after 5 years. Subgroup membership was predictive of external clinical outcomes up to 5 years. Thus, this study demonstrated the stability and predictive value of the autism subgroups, especially for the two‐year follow‐up. A further focus on their clinical utility might increase the aptness of support, and may provide more insight into the aging process when being autistic.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée