Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 13/01/2024 20:47

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Lien intégré au billet Termes sur l’autisme

1 réponse intégrée de Michelle Dawson

13/01/2024 20:49

Note: "Although clinicians were asked to indicate the setting used to form their initial impression, this information was only completed for three children (and all selected 'exploring the evaluation room'); therefore data on the setting is considered missing"

Voir la réponse sur Bluesky

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Rebecca P. Thomas, Ashley de Marchena, Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski, Aubyn Stahmer, Stephanie Milan, Jeffrey D. Burke, Marianne L. Barton, Diana L. Robins, et al. (2024). Accuracy of initial diagnostic impressions of autism in toddlers and behaviors that inform these impressions. Autism Research, 17(3), 568-583. Wiley.

Date de publication
12/01/2024
Identifiant
10.1002/aur.3088
Auteurs
Rebecca P. Thomas, Ashley de Marchena, Andrea Trubanova Wieckowski, Aubyn Stahmer, Stephanie Milan, Jeffrey D. Burke, Marianne L. Barton, Diana L. Robins, Deborah A. Fein
Source
Autism Research
Détails
17(3), 568-583
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Wiley
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

Abstract Clinicians form initial impressions about a child's diagnosis based on behavioral features, but research has not yet identified specific behaviors to guide initial diagnostic impressions. Participants were toddlers (N = 55, mean age 22.9 months) from a multi‐site early detection study, referred for concern for ASD due to screening or parent/provider concern. Within 5 min of meeting a child, clinicians noted ASD or non‐ASD impression, confidence in impression, and behaviors that informed their impression. These clinicians also determined final diagnoses for each child. When a child's final diagnosis was ASD (n = 35), senior clinicians formed an initial impression of ASD in 22 cases (63%) but missed 13 cases (37%). When final diagnosis was non‐ASD (n = 20), senior clinicians made an initial impression of non‐ASD in all cases (100%). Results were similar among junior clinicians. Senior and junior clinicians used the same behaviors to form accurate impressions of ASD and non‐ASD: social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, and eye contact. Senior clinicians additionally used focus of attention when forming accurate impressions of ASD and non‐ASD; junior clinicians used this behavior only when forming accurate non‐ASD impressions. Clinicians' initial impressions of ASD are very likely to be consistent with final diagnoses, but initial impressions of non‐ASD need follow‐up. Toddlers who show all four atypical behaviors (social reciprocity, nonverbal communication, eye contact, and focus of attention) might receive expedited ASD diagnoses. However, presence of apparently typical behaviors should not rule out ASD; for some children a longer evaluation is necessary to allow for more opportunities to observe subtle social behavior.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée