Billets de Michelle Dawson

Billet publié sur Bluesky le 08/01/2024 11:02

Bluesky Publication avec DOI crossref Extrait cité dans le billet Question posée par Dawson dans le billet Lien intégré au billet

Liens cités structurés

1 ressource citée

Publication avec DOI Récupéré Publication crossref

Giovanni Pezzulo, Thomas Parr, Karl Friston (2024). Active inference as a theory of sentient behavior. Biological Psychology, 186, 108741. Elsevier BV.

Date de publication
février 2024
Identifiant
10.1016/j.biopsycho.2023.108741
Auteurs
Giovanni Pezzulo, Thomas Parr, Karl Friston
Source
Biological Psychology
Détails
186, 108741
Type de référence
article
Éditeur
Elsevier BV
Source de métadonnées
crossref

Résumé

This review paper offers an overview of the history and future of active inference-a unifying perspective on action and perception. Active inference is based upon the idea that sentient behavior depends upon our brains' implicit use of internal models to predict, infer, and direct action. Our focus is upon the conceptual roots and development of this theory of (basic) sentience and does not follow a rigid chronological narrative. We trace the evolution from Helmholtzian ideas on unconscious inference, through to a contemporary understanding of action and perception. In doing so, we touch upon related perspectives, the neural underpinnings of active inference, and the opportunities for future development. Key steps in this development include the formulation of predictive coding models and related theories of neuronal message passing, the use of sequential models for planning and policy optimization, and the importance of hierarchical (temporally) deep internal (i.e., generative or world) models. Active inference has been used to account for aspects of anatomy and neurophysiology, to offer theories of psychopathology in terms of aberrant precision control, and to unify extant psychological theories. We anticipate further development in all these areas and note the exciting early work applying active inference beyond neuroscience. This suggests a future not just in biology, but in robotics, machine learning, and artificial intelligence.

Auteur·ices de l’étude dans cette référence citée