Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 25 Jul 2026 12:16

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Now there are toddler versions of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-T) & Systemising Quotient (SQ-T)?--"a reduced drive to empathise may be more strongly linked to autistic traits than an increased drive to systemise, particularly in toddlerhood"?? (see Fig 2) link.springer.com/article/10.1... free

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Yumnah T. Khan, Alex Tsompanidis, Luning Sun, Carrie Allison, Simon Baron-Cohen (2026). The Empathy Quotient and Systemising Quotient for Toddlers: Development and Validation. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. Springer Science and Business Media LLC.

Publication date
23 Jul 2026
Identifier
10.1007/s10803-026-07427-9
Authors
Yumnah T. Khan, Alex Tsompanidis, Luning Sun, Carrie Allison, Simon Baron-Cohen
Source
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
Reference type
article
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Empathy and systemising are traits that show on-average differences between autistic and non-autistic groups and have informed major theoretical frameworks of autism. While these constructs have been researched extensively in older age groups, no equivalent questionnaire-based measures exist for toddlers. Methods Here, we developed and validated toddler (T) versions of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-T) and Systemising Quotient (SQ-T) in 1,005 toddlers (572 males, 433 females) aged 1.5 to 4 years (mean = 32.75 months). Parents completed these online along with the Quantitative Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (Q-CHAT), which measures autistic traits. Results Results indicated that (a) the EQ-T and SQ-T show good reliability, (b) EQ-T scores negatively predicted and SQ-T scores positively predicted autistic traits, and (c) on average, EQ-T scores were higher in females (d = 0.16), while no significant sex differences were observed in SQ-T scores (d = −0.09). Conclusion These newly validated measures open various further avenues to better understand the early profiles and developmental pathways associated with autism.

Study authors in this cited reference