Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 17 Oct 2024 12:33

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Autistic (vs typical) children are less successful intercepting a ball? "prediction-related challenges may underlie the behavioral features of autism"? onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/... but typical children have "unanticipated challenges" catching with a funnel, contra the authors' predictions

View on Bluesky

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Se‐Woong Park, Annie Cardinaux, Dena Crozier, Marta Russo, Sabrina Bond, Margaret Kjelgaard, Pawan Sinha, Dagmar Sternad (2024). Interceptive abilities in autism spectrum disorder: Comparing naturalistic and virtual visuomotor tasks. Autism Research, 17(12), 2514-2534. Wiley.

Publication date
16 Oct 2024
Identifier
10.1002/aur.3246
Authors
Se‐Woong Park, Annie Cardinaux, Dena Crozier, Marta Russo, Sabrina Bond, Margaret Kjelgaard, Pawan Sinha, Dagmar Sternad
Source
Autism Research
Details
17(12), 2514-2534
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract A growing body of research reveals that autistic individuals exhibit motor coordination challenges. Multiple theoretical frameworks propose that the seemingly disparate features of autism may arise from a common underlying process: a diminished ability to make predictions. Sensorimotor skills, such as catching a ball, critically rely on predicting the ball's trajectory as well as anticipatory coordination of the entire body. Here, we assessed four different naturalistic and virtual interception tasks with 31 neurotypical and 23 autistic children (ages 7–12). In a naturalistic setting, participants caught the ball either with their hands or a hand‐held funnel with an enlarged catch area that also prevented the ball from bouncing off. A virtual setup reduced whole‐body demands, as children only moved a paddle to catch or bounce a ball on a screen. Control tasks, involving rapid reaching to grasp a static object and quiet standing, which largely eliminated the requirements for prediction, were also tested. Results from all task variations demonstrated that autistic children completed fewer successful interceptions, suggesting that predictive requirements, inherent to all interception tasks, played a critical role. Effect sizes in the virtual tasks were smaller. Correlations of the task metrics with behavioral assessments rendered the strongest correlations with Praxis scores. The control tasks showed no differences between autistic and neurotypical children. These findings lend support to the emerging hypothesis that predictive challenges are present in autism. Further research with larger sample sizes will help identify to what extent these visuomotor differences may inform core domains of autism.

Study authors in this cited reference