Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 20 Jul 2024 11:50

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Kyle Sterrett, Elaine Clarke, Jane Nofer, Joseph Piven, Catherine Lord (2024). Toward a functional classification for autism in adulthood. Autism Research, 17(10), 2105-2119. Wiley.

Publication date
19 Jul 2024
Identifier
10.1002/aur.3201
Authors
Kyle Sterrett, Elaine Clarke, Jane Nofer, Joseph Piven, Catherine Lord
Source
Autism Research
Details
17(10), 2105-2119
Reference type
article
Publisher
Wiley
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Abstract Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a heterogeneous condition that affects development and functioning from infancy through adulthood. Efforts to parse the heterogeneity of the autism spectrum through subgroups such as Asperger's and Profound Autism have been controversial, and have consistently struggled with issues of reliability, validity, and interpretability. Nonetheless, methods for successfully identifying clinically meaningful subgroups within autism are needed to ensure that research, interventions, and services address the range of needs experienced by autistic individuals. The purpose of this study was to generate and test whether a simple set of questions, organized in a flowchart, could be used in clinical practice and research to differentiate meaningful subgroups based on individuals' level of functioning. Once generated, subgroups could also be compared to the recently proposed administrative category of Profound Autism and to groupings based on standardized adaptive measures. Ninety‐seven adults with autism or related neurodevelopmental disorders participating in a longstanding longitudinal study, or their caregivers if they could not answer for themselves, completed phone interviews when the participants were ~30 years old. Information from these phone interviews was used to generate vignettes summarizing characteristics and aspects of the daily lives of each participant (e.g., language level, vocational activities, and social relationships). Three expert clinicians then used these vignettes to classify each participant based on their level of support needs. Meaningfully distinct subgroups within the sample were identified which could be reliably distinguished from one another. Implications of such categorizations and future directions are discussed.

Study authors in this cited reference