Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 17 Mar 2024 09:52

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Sam Fellowes (2025). Establishing the accuracy of self-diagnosis in psychiatry. Philosophical Psychology, 38(6), 2542-2569. Informa UK Limited.

Publication date
10 Mar 2024
Identifier
10.1080/09515089.2024.2327823
Authors
Sam Fellowes
Source
Philosophical Psychology
Details
38(6), 2542-2569
Reference type
article
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Self-diagnosis in psychiatry is where individuals diagnose themselves rather than rely upon official diagnosticians to supply a psychiatric diagnosis.The accuracy of self-diagnosis is a contested topic.In this paper, I outline what arguments are needed to see self-diagnosis as accurate and how different approaches to self-diagnosis require different arguments.I show how different arguments are required to justify accuracy for an autistic individual judging they are autistic compared to non-autistic individuals judging they are not autistic.Different arguments are required if a selfdiagnosing individual accepts or rejects official diagnostic criteria.Finally, different arguments are required depending upon whether diagnoses are seen as objective entities, the product of theoretical virtues or practically useful groupings.All these approaches require unique arguments to justify the accuracy of self-diagnosis.Identifying the required arguments for different approaches is a stepping stone toward establishing whether those arguments and which of those arguments can be successfully justified.

Study authors in this cited reference