Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Bluesky on 25 Oct 2023 18:51

Bluesky DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post Question asked by Dawson in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Vanessa Tomas, Shauna Kingsnorth, Evdokia Anagnostou, Bonnie Kirsh, Sally Lindsay (2024). “I Wish This Tool Was Available to Me Sooner”: Piloting a Workplace Autism Disclosure Decision-Aid Tool for Autistic Youth and Young Adults. Autism in Adulthood, 6(3), 331-344. SAGE Publications.

Publication date
16 Sep 2024
Identifier
10.1089/aut.2023.0054
Authors
Vanessa Tomas, Shauna Kingsnorth, Evdokia Anagnostou, Bonnie Kirsh, Sally Lindsay
Source
Autism in Adulthood
Details
6(3), 331-344
Reference type
article
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

Background: For autistic youth and young adults, deciding whether to disclose their autism at work may be complex since they are newly entering the workforce and are at an impressionable developmental period. Decision-aid tools can help someone make a choice regarding a topic/situation. We developed a workplace autism disclosure decision-aid tool called DISCLOSURE (Do I Start the Conversation and Let On, Speak Up, and REveal?) to support autistic youth and young adults navigate disclosure decision-making. In this study, we aimed to assess the DISCLOSURE tool's (1) impact on decision-making and self-determination capabilities and (2) usability, feasibility, and acceptability. Methods: This was a single-arm pre–post pilot study. The DISCLOSURE tool comprises three interactive PDF documents and videos. Thirty participants (mean age of 23.5 years) completed online surveys before and after interacting with the DISCLOSURE tool. We used descriptive statistics for usability, feasibility, and acceptability. We calculated the Wilcoxon signed rank and paired t -tests to determine pre–post changes in decision-making and self-determination capabilities (Decisional Conflict Scale–Low Literacy Version [DCS-LL]; adapted Arc's Self-Determination Scale). We analyzed open-ended data using conventional (inductive) content analysis. Results: There were significant decreases in DCS-LL total and subscale scores (p < 0.0001) and a significant increase in Arc's total score (p = 0.01), suggesting important improvements. There were no significant increases for Arc's psychological empowerment and self-realization subscales (p = 0.05; p = 0.09). Median scores (4.0/5.0) indicate that participants agreed that the DISCLOSURE tool is acceptable, feasible, and meets the usability criteria. We developed four categories to describe the open-ended data: (1) disclosure capabilities, (2) the role of others, (3) positive tool impact and feedback, and (4) minimal tool impact and constructive feedback. Discussion: Findings are suggestive of the DISCLOSURE tool's ability to support workplace autism disclosure decision-making. Future studies should ascertain the DISCLOSURE tool's effectiveness, explore others' feedback (e.g., employers), and how to incorporate the tool into relevant employment and vocational programs.

Study authors in this cited reference