Michelle Dawson posts

Post published on Twitter/X on 28 Jul 2020 12:09

Twitter/X DOI work crossref Extract quoted in the post External link integrated into the post Autism terms

Structured cited links

1 cited resource

DOI work Fetched Post crossref

Jan J. Sprengers, Dorinde M. van Andel, Nicolaas P.A. Zuithoff, Mandy G. Keijzer-Veen, Annelien J.A. Schulp, Floortje E. Scheepers, Marc R. Lilien, Bob Oranje, et al. (2021). Bumetanide for Core Symptoms of Autism Spectrum Disorder (BAMBI): A Single Center, Double-Blinded, Participant-Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Phase-2 Superiority Trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 60(7), 865-876. Elsevier BV.

Publication date
July 2021
Identifier
10.1016/j.jaac.2020.07.888
Authors
Jan J. Sprengers, Dorinde M. van Andel, Nicolaas P.A. Zuithoff, Mandy G. Keijzer-Veen, Annelien J.A. Schulp, Floortje E. Scheepers, Marc R. Lilien, Bob Oranje, Hilgo Bruining
Source
Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
Details
60(7), 865-876
Reference type
article
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Metadata source
crossref

Abstract

ObjectiveRecent trials have indicated positive effects of bumetanide in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We tested efficacy of bumetanide on core symptom domains using a single center, parallel-group, participant-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase-2 superiority trial in a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands.MethodUnmedicated children aged 7 to 15 years with ASD and IQ ≥55 were block-randomized 1:1 to oral-solution bumetanide versus placebo, titrated to a maximum of 1.0 mg twice daily for 91 days (D91), followed by a 28-day wash-out period. The primary outcome was difference in Social Responsiveness Scale−2 (SRS-2) total score at D91, analyzed by modified intention-to-treat with linear mixed models.ResultsA total of 92 participants (mean age 10.5 [SD 2.4] years) enrolled between June 2016 and December 2018. In all, 47 children were allocated to bumetanide and 45 to placebo. Two participants dropped out per treatment arm. After 91 days, bumetanide was not superior to placebo on the primary outcome, the SRS-2 (mean difference −3.16, 95% CI = −9.68 to 3.37, p =.338). A superior effect was found on one of the secondary outcomes, the Repetitive Behavior Scale−Revised (mean difference −4.16, 95% CI = −8.06 to −0.25, p =.0375), but not on the Sensory Profile (mean difference 5.64, 95% CI = −11.30 to 22.57, p =.508) or the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability Subscale (mean difference −0.65, 95% CI = −2.83 to 1.52, p =.552). No significant wash-out effect was observed. Significant adverse effects were predominantly diuretic effects (orthostatic hypotension (17 [36%] versus 5 [11%], p =.007); hypokalemia (24 [51%] versus 0 [0%], p <.0001), the occurrence of which did not statistically influence treatment outcome.ConclusionThe trial outcome was negative in terms of no superior effect on the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes suggest efficacy on repetitive behavior symptoms for a subset of patients.Clinical trial registration informationBumetanide in Autism Medication and Biomarker Study (BAMBI); https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/; 2014-001560-35. Recent trials have indicated positive effects of bumetanide in autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We tested efficacy of bumetanide on core symptom domains using a single center, parallel-group, participant-randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase-2 superiority trial in a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. Unmedicated children aged 7 to 15 years with ASD and IQ ≥55 were block-randomized 1:1 to oral-solution bumetanide versus placebo, titrated to a maximum of 1.0 mg twice daily for 91 days (D91), followed by a 28-day wash-out period. The primary outcome was difference in Social Responsiveness Scale−2 (SRS-2) total score at D91, analyzed by modified intention-to-treat with linear mixed models. A total of 92 participants (mean age 10.5 [SD 2.4] years) enrolled between June 2016 and December 2018. In all, 47 children were allocated to bumetanide and 45 to placebo. Two participants dropped out per treatment arm. After 91 days, bumetanide was not superior to placebo on the primary outcome, the SRS-2 (mean difference −3.16, 95% CI = −9.68 to 3.37, p =.338). A superior effect was found on one of the secondary outcomes, the Repetitive Behavior Scale−Revised (mean difference −4.16, 95% CI = −8.06 to −0.25, p =.0375), but not on the Sensory Profile (mean difference 5.64, 95% CI = −11.30 to 22.57, p =.508) or the Aberrant Behavior Checklist Irritability Subscale (mean difference −0.65, 95% CI = −2.83 to 1.52, p =.552). No significant wash-out effect was observed. Significant adverse effects were predominantly diuretic effects (orthostatic hypotension (17 [36%] versus 5 [11%], p =.007); hypokalemia (24 [51%] versus 0 [0%], p <.0001), the occurrence of which did not statistically influence treatment outcome. The trial outcome was negative in terms of no superior effect on the primary outcome. The secondary outcomes suggest efficacy on repetitive behavior symptoms for a subset of patients.

Study authors in this cited reference